I have discovered that the username
ewe was recently returned to the pool of available names. I'm really quite tempted to change to that, so I need you guys to help me make the decision. (Good usernames don't hang around very long, so if I wanted it, I'd have to act fairly fast.)
Pro:
[Poll #491216]
Pro:
- It's a very cool username.
- A three-letter username would have a certain cachet.
- I'd be supporting LJ by buying a rename token.
- I don't like
livredor as a handle; I meant it to be the title of my blog, and it doesn't really work as an identity.
- It would cost $15.
- It might confuse people who have got used to calling me
livredor or Liv. - I've kind of built up an identity as
livredor, even if I didn't intend that when I created the name. - I have a subdomain at livredor.p5.org.uk, and a email address based on livredor@[domain], and I've generally been using livredor on quite a few places on the web apart from LJ now.
- People might confuse me with
ewx
[Poll #491216]
(no subject)
Date: 2005-05-10 05:32 pm (UTC)I may be mildly biased from having worked a couple of years at the same institution as some people studying memory and face recognition in sheep, but the things are stupid, and you're so not.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-05-10 05:41 pm (UTC)What you could do is bag 'ewe' as a free account for a while and try it out to see if it 'fits' at all and then make the switch if you still want to? Thereby postponing an actual decision :)
(no subject)
Date: 2005-05-10 06:00 pm (UTC)That's very decisive! And I'm not sure it's fair to give you five votes for being emphatic, but why not, since this is a very non-serious poll anyway.
Dick King-Smith, quoted from memory.
Well, thank you for that! You'll have to blame my parents for giving me an inappropriate name, if I'm not stupid enough to be Ewe.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-05-10 06:05 pm (UTC)Thank you! I think other people like it more than I do, which might be a reason to keep it.
Sadly this is not possible; LJ doesn't allow you to create a new account with a name that was formerly in use. If you want old names you have to change the name of an existing account. Otherwise it would be a good idea, if slightly mean.
If you dont like your original...
Date: 2005-05-10 06:08 pm (UTC)you know whats funny ... my boyfriend, Alex, and I say ..."I love ewe" lol ..meaning you ...but being cute ..of course ...but "ewe" would be a cool name... yes ...your friends might be confused ...but they would get used to it ...just let them know you have changed it ... you know ... have fun with your new possible name ...you know ...
sincerely ...
natalie
Another reason not: homonyms
Date: 2005-05-10 06:10 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-05-10 06:23 pm (UTC)Ah I didn't realise that. Does this mean that even if you are new and want a disused name you need to create a temporary account and then 'adopt' from it?
Ethically I think its OK to squat for a little while if you want to try out the name - its not like you are planning to keep both permanently. In fact I see no particular problem with using both permanently if you used them for different things eg Livredor maybe for all you books discussions and Ewe for 'the meaning of life' because you would actually be using them both rather than simply sitting on a name. I keep a seperate blog for work which has no overlap with anything else and I know a few bloggers and LJers who do something similar - two strands for two aspects of life, sets of interests or even personae although work/non work seems the common split. Mind you this may predate easy subject organisation with Wordpress/MoveableType style software.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-05-10 06:26 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-05-10 08:43 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-05-10 09:07 pm (UTC)As for stupid sheep, well, there's a saying in Norway, Sauer er ålreite dyr - "Sheep are all right animals", so there!
Long story about a party who, years ago, wanted to give more more money to sheep farming. When asked "why sheep?" the politician in charge couldn't come up with a better reason.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-05-11 09:12 am (UTC)(Basically, she'd have to create a dummy account and rename that, for $15, to "livredor", displacing the current "livredor" to something like "ex_livredor821", then rename *that* account to "ewe".)
(no subject)
Date: 2005-05-11 09:14 am (UTC)Basically, yes.
So that'd cost $15 for the "free" account, since you have to buy a rename token.
Then if she decides she likes the name and would like to move over all the content (and paid time, and styles, etc.) from "livredor" to "ewe", she could still do so, but would have to pay another $15.
A baaaaad idea
Date: 2005-05-11 09:14 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-05-11 01:06 pm (UTC)Yes, that is exactly how the system is set up. I don't know entirely why this is; it's either that old names should not be resuable at all, and it's a loophole, or it's that the account creation thing has an overly strict way of checking whether a name is free.
Well, since TPTB are talking about actually purging deleted accounts more regularly, I think it's not such a problem. In the past, if you squatted a username and then decided to delete it, it could be years before it was made available again. Also, this only applies to buying a previously used name; squatting a new username is pretty mean, because you change it from being free and easily available, to costing $15 and only available to those in the know.
I very much don't want to have more than one journal. Not that it's in principle a bad idea, just it really doesn't suit me. (I have a secondary journal,
(no subject)
Date: 2005-05-11 01:09 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-05-11 01:20 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-05-11 01:27 pm (UTC)Essentially, no. See
(no subject)
Date: 2005-05-11 01:30 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-05-11 01:32 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-05-11 01:35 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-05-11 01:41 pm (UTC)I can't claim all the credit, though; this entry (http://www.livejournal.com/community/howtosupport/2994.html) by
But yes, I like to be helpful :) And I don't mind the occasional dig around LiveJournal's source code to answer a question of how, exactly, things work.
I remember one of my own support requests was about how renaming works, and involved
(no subject)
Date: 2005-05-11 05:35 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-05-12 09:12 am (UTC)I really don't want two journals. The LJ system isn't well set up for it, and I want to keep all my friends in one place, and it would just lead to extra complication which isn't helpful.
There might be something to be said for having a blog that I didn't mind associating with my name, and that I would be happy to let employers etc find when they googled me. The trouble is I have no idea at all what I'd put in it.
The problem is that if it's a case of converting my existing journal, I can justify the money to myself. But if it's buying a secondary journal (when I could just create a free one, albeit with a less cool name), it seems extravagant.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-05-12 09:16 am (UTC)That's exactly the problem: I don't think of myself as
*broad grin* Thank you!
Oh yes, definitely. That feels like an argument for keeping the current name though.
Thanks for that little snippet, I really like that story!
(no subject)
Date: 2005-05-12 09:18 am (UTC)Oh well, fair enough. Those are the arguments which are already inclining me towards the negative.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-05-12 05:21 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-23 10:41 am (UTC)That said, I suspect you are just a random drive-by troll, in which case you won't see this reply.