(no subject)

Date: 2008-02-12 09:33 pm (UTC)
Now, it's made clear elsewhere that it's Audley the character who is homophobic, not the author. But to be making that kind of joke, which relies on the idea that nobody could ever possibly imagine that a woman could be a doctor in the seventies (incidentally some thirty years after my grandmother qualified as a doctor, and it wasn't news then), is abyssmal.

I got caught out by a riddle that relied on the fact a doctor was a woman in the nineties, and I'd had a female doctor living across my parents' back fence when I grew up. It's not that being a female doctor is inconceivable, it's just that the default interpretation kicks in really fast in cases of gender-neutral speech.

The second speaker in the above quote would probably have figured it out a few seconds later, but the first speaker explains it before he gets a chance. (He says, not having read the book, therefore not really having a leg to stand on.)
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org

Soundbite

Miscellaneous. Eclectic. Random. Perhaps markedly literate, or at least suffering from the compulsion to read any text that presents itself, including cereal boxes.

Top topics

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
45678 910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags

Subscription Filters