Bits of conversation for wider exposure
Jun. 25th, 2008 11:49 amSome unanswered questions from conversations recently:
Why, yes, I am supposed to be working. I'm hoping that interesting speculation on these questions will provide a minor distraction, but not enough of one to keep me from getting any work done at all...
In other news, I have reorganized my flist a bit. I hope this won't lead to drama; I promise that I haven't removed anyone due to being offended by them or thinking badly of them. It's just that that sociological theory that says people can only really handle being connected to a community of about a hundred people seems to apply to LJ as well, at least for me. I had twice that number, and I came to the point where I just had to admit that there were some people I wasn't getting to know, however much I admired them. Of course, by removing a few dozen of the people I interact with least, I haven't actually made my reading much easier to manage. But just to make it absolutely clear, you're entirely welcome to keep reading if you find my journal interesting, and indeed if we start getting into conversations I'll probably add you back. Equally, if you don't have time to follow me I am not going to take offence.
My ideal is to have around 80 to 100 friends and carefully read every word they write and comment and join in discussions. But to get to that level would require cutting people I can't bear to do without, and I can't help myself meeting new shiny people and wanting to add them too, so I'm still really over capacity. *sigh*
- Is there such a thing as a lesbian icon?
There were a group of mostly straight or at least non-scene women out with a gay man, and we were trying to get him to explain the gay icon thing. Like, why are most gay icons straight women, such as Cher, Madonna, Judy Garland and so on, and not, you know, actual gay men? His theory was that a gay icon needs to be flamboyant and overtly sexual towards men, but preferably projecting a happy, confident image, as opposed to the angst and emo typical of the few male artists who actually talk directly about gay themes.
Somebody asked, what about lesbians, are there any lesbian icons? I could only think of celebrities who are either well known to be lesbians such as Ellen de Generes, or actresses who are known for lesbian roles, such as Alyson Hannigan. But they are not really icons in quite the same way, I think. I did end up offering to make a playlist of lesbian themed music, though, so any suggestions welcome. - How do they make holy water?
This is from the picnic. Of course we all know that it requires a priest who has to bless the water. But how exactly does it work practically? Does the priest bless a large volume of water and then divide it up into lots of little bottles, each of which is holy? Can the holy water be diluted with normal water, and does that make the mixture holy or unholy? Or does the priest have to bless exactly this particular water in this particular vessel? Is there a maximum amount that the priest can bless at any one time? Does the holiness stick to the water forever, or does it have to be water that was blessed recently? Is it different for Catholics and Protestants?
I hope these questions aren't irreverent; we really do want to know. But they might the kind of questions that only make sense in a conversation between Jews and geeks, and completely miss the point of how Christian theology works.
Why, yes, I am supposed to be working. I'm hoping that interesting speculation on these questions will provide a minor distraction, but not enough of one to keep me from getting any work done at all...
In other news, I have reorganized my flist a bit. I hope this won't lead to drama; I promise that I haven't removed anyone due to being offended by them or thinking badly of them. It's just that that sociological theory that says people can only really handle being connected to a community of about a hundred people seems to apply to LJ as well, at least for me. I had twice that number, and I came to the point where I just had to admit that there were some people I wasn't getting to know, however much I admired them. Of course, by removing a few dozen of the people I interact with least, I haven't actually made my reading much easier to manage. But just to make it absolutely clear, you're entirely welcome to keep reading if you find my journal interesting, and indeed if we start getting into conversations I'll probably add you back. Equally, if you don't have time to follow me I am not going to take offence.
My ideal is to have around 80 to 100 friends and carefully read every word they write and comment and join in discussions. But to get to that level would require cutting people I can't bear to do without, and I can't help myself meeting new shiny people and wanting to add them too, so I'm still really over capacity. *sigh*
(no subject)
Date: 2008-06-25 11:13 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-06-25 11:21 am (UTC)Xena, Warrior Princess?
(no subject)
Date: 2008-06-25 11:23 am (UTC)holy water
Date: 2008-06-25 11:28 am (UTC)Holy water is water that - through being blessed - is set apart for a religious purpose. A priest can bless holy water for a single occassion (i.e. the rite of Asperges (sprinkling, in lieu of the Confiteor (the general confession of sin) before Mass, or a Baptism). A priest can also bless a larger volume of water, contained in a plastic tank, say and one can help oneself to it (bring your own little bottle)
In theory I suppose a priest could bless a limitless amount of water, but because it must be set apart for a holy purpose this implies a priest would only bless an amount of water that one could actually use for a purpose. I don`t think there is a maximum volume set anywhere in either holy tradition or canon law, but common sense applies.
As far as mixtures are concerned, yes, as long as the added 'normal' water does not exceed the volume of originally blessed water.
How long does the Holiness stick? I suppose for as long as the water is still water and not fetid moldy gooie stuff. Or, more strictly, as long as the water can still be used for a holy purpose, and it generally can`t if it's skanky.
anyway, loads more here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_water
I don`t think Protestants actually use Holy Water at all. Except Anglicans and their kind of funny as far as protestants go.
holy water
Date: 2008-06-25 11:42 am (UTC)Good point about real Protestants. I'd forgotten about proper European Lutherans, I'm so used to Anglicans who are basically Catholics except not listening to the Pope.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-06-25 11:43 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-06-25 11:47 am (UTC)Re: holy water
Date: 2008-06-25 11:48 am (UTC)I like Anglicans :-) big big soft spot.
Re: holy water
Date: 2008-06-25 12:12 pm (UTC)Could a priest bless a lake if the holy purpose involved travelling across it in a boat, in order to prevent evil spirits lurking within from causing trouble with the journey?
Re: holy water
Date: 2008-06-25 12:17 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-06-25 12:21 pm (UTC)I think you are solving a different problem from the one I actually have, though. There were about 30 people on my friendslist who are generally interesting, and talk just the right amount, but left me feeling that I didn't really know them any better after reading their LJs for a few months. I didn't really feel any inclination to comment on their posts, and they rarely commented on mine. I would like to keep these people until I do know them well enough to feel connected to them, but I just have too many people. Moving them into a rarely checked filter would just make it even less likely that I'll ever get to know them. The plan is that if I remove them, more of my LJ time will be spent talking to people and strengthening existing connections, rather than all of it being taken up by just reading really interesting posts from people I don't know.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-06-25 12:40 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-06-25 01:04 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-06-25 01:17 pm (UTC)The body of Christ may be stored; you have to put it in a, um, *thing* (tabernacle?) that is specially wossname for the purpose. But because it's usually wafers rather than normal bread it keeps fine. You take it out and use it next time, or take it 'round to sick people. Plus you can keep it this way so that if a non-priest has a service they can give out the body of Christ (which only a priest can consecrate).
The blood of Christ may *never* be stored consecrated (obviously you store the wine prior to consecration) nor thrown away. It must be drunk, this is normally done by the people who hand it out (Eucharistic ministers?) and the priest. I guess you could ask for volunteers if you stupidly consecrated a whole bottle when only 5 people wanted to receive.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-06-25 01:22 pm (UTC)L: Thanks for bringing it up :) What really bugs me is I'm sure I had some reason, probably not vampire related, for wondering in the first place, but I can't remember what it was :)
1. Is there such a thing as a lesbian icon?
Date: 2008-06-25 02:12 pm (UTC)My third, even more inappropriate, was about little statues of the virgin mary :)
(no subject)
Date: 2008-06-25 02:14 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-06-25 02:28 pm (UTC)Apparently I have stronger opinions on this topic than I realized, because my brain's generating a number of additional ideas.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-06-25 02:39 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-06-25 03:07 pm (UTC)Drive-by punning
Date: 2008-06-25 03:13 pm (UTC)It makes it holyopathic!
Re: Drive-by punning
Date: 2008-06-25 03:25 pm (UTC)It is the fault of this post and this comment, though.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-06-25 03:33 pm (UTC)Well, according to a recent meeting of Wychwood old gits 'looks feminine, shaves infrequently, sounds like a lesbian to me', is an accurate description. All I need now is for people to know who I am and I'm all ready to assume iconic status.
Of course, given my generally shy and reticent nature, this may prove a problem...
(no subject)
Date: 2008-06-25 03:37 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-06-25 03:40 pm (UTC)