(no subject)

Date: 2012-04-17 08:22 am (UTC)
nameandnature: Giles from Buffy (Default)
But there's probably a reason for it to do with strengthening the Spiritual domain, because a church than control its members' sexuality has a very major emotional hold on them.

Religions which have a cost to following them (not necessarily monetary) do better than those which don't make demands on their followers, ISTR (I'd like to be able to quote the research here but I can't think of good search terms). This is a bit like what someone said in the locked discussion that a liberal religion didn't seem worth getting out of bed for, I suppose.

I'm not sure what the psychology of that is. Maybe it's a bit like when you never buy the cheapest brand, or maybe people want challenges and want to be part of a narrative where they struggle and perhaps overcome them. Back when I was an evangelical Christian, a common piece of jargon was to say "I was challenged" (by that sermon, say) to mean that "I've realised I'm falling short there".

Why specifically homophobia? Well, it's the patriarchy, innit? Also, if you're going to pick an out-group to strengthen your in-group by having an identified enemy, it's good to pick a sin to which few of them are tempted.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org

Soundbite

Miscellaneous. Eclectic. Random. Perhaps markedly literate, or at least suffering from the compulsion to read any text that presents itself, including cereal boxes.

Top topics

July 2025

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
1314151617 1819
20212223242526
27 28293031  

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags

Subscription Filters