I was in single-sex education from age 8 to 16 (and I was quite isolated from boys, as I didn't have any brothers, and didn't get involved with church until the summer of GCSEs).
Unlike you, I do think it hindered me pursuing science/tech subjects: because it was an all-girls' school they just didn't think they needed to offer those subjects as much as a mixed school might have. They only offered double-award GCSE science rather than three separate science GCSEs, and they didn't offer computing/IT GCSE (they did make us do the CLAIT course, which as far as I can tell is for people who want to be secretaries). They offered GCSEs in Food and Textiles instead.
Luckily, only having double-award science didn't actually stop me getting to do maths and science A-levels at a mixed sixth form. Once there, I was the only girl in top set Physics and in most of my Further Maths classes, so I expect if that had been an all-girls' school those classes wouldn't have existed.
Miscellaneous. Eclectic. Random. Perhaps markedly literate, or at least suffering from the compulsion to read any text that presents itself, including cereal boxes.
(no subject)
Date: 2014-01-20 04:20 pm (UTC)Unlike you, I do think it hindered me pursuing science/tech subjects: because it was an all-girls' school they just didn't think they needed to offer those subjects as much as a mixed school might have. They only offered double-award GCSE science rather than three separate science GCSEs, and they didn't offer computing/IT GCSE (they did make us do the CLAIT course, which as far as I can tell is for people who want to be secretaries). They offered GCSEs in Food and Textiles instead.
Luckily, only having double-award science didn't actually stop me getting to do maths and science A-levels at a mixed sixth form. Once there, I was the only girl in top set Physics and in most of my Further Maths classes, so I expect if that had been an all-girls' school those classes wouldn't have existed.