Well, we do teach our students about the social model and disablism and so on, but being taught doesn't mean they actually learn it. In fact, I was really really delighted a couple of years back when they replaced a somewhat dreadful if well-meaning mobility aid simulation with a workshop run by a trainer who is herself physically disabled as the core of this part of the teaching. It might well be that they'll learn better from reading a novel they empathize with, than from formal teaching.
I think I personally need to read the Quarmby, though it's daunting. I think it's too scholarly for this particular project where we're looking more for engagement with literature and Humanities. But I might well try and get it onto the more core reading list for the disability module, as it sounds highly relevant and more up-to-date than a lot of the theoretical sociology stuff we're assigning at the moment.
Miscellaneous. Eclectic. Random. Perhaps markedly literate, or at least suffering from the compulsion to read any text that presents itself, including cereal boxes.
(no subject)
Date: 2015-03-24 03:53 pm (UTC)I think I personally need to read the Quarmby, though it's daunting. I think it's too scholarly for this particular project where we're looking more for engagement with literature and Humanities. But I might well try and get it onto the more core reading list for the disability module, as it sounds highly relevant and more up-to-date than a lot of the theoretical sociology stuff we're assigning at the moment.