Well, that was a bad idea
Aug. 15th, 2024 10:22 amWe (
jack and I) got Covid at Worldcon, or possibly travelling back from it.
So yes,
purplecthulhu and others, you were right, it was a bad risk. There's no point second guessing what points I could have chosen a different balance between masking and eating. Lots of people I know who are as scrupulous or more so about masking also caught plague. It's pretty clear anecdotally and from what little data we have that population levels are really high right now, and mixing over 7000 people from all over the world in a mostly enclosed space for 5 days was never going to give good odds.
On the whole it was a good con. Very well organized, I'm sure there's going to be some scandal coming out but it looked to me like they did most things right and avoided many of the pitfalls of other cons. The programming was generally really good; I didn't go to a single bad panel or talk. The worst experience I had, and this was a bit of a theme, was three really interesting and knowledgeable experts being talked over by one white male blowhard who wrote a book on a vaguely related subject. Generally the moderators were pretty good at keeping a lid on this sort of thing, but almost every good panel I went to would have been even better if that one white guy hadn't been there. (To be clear, different white guys in every case.) That is still a massive improvement on previous experiences where three random mediocre white men completely drowning out the one interesting panellist is more typical.
Events were well matched to room sizes. Not perfectly, but perfection is impossible. And the whole venue had a very very strict policy that you don't overfill rooms; I was impressed that the whole volunteer team backed up the employees in enforcing this, no 'just this once' exceptions for famous or pushy people, so they completely avoided any kind of asshole filter issues. Queues were not excessively long, and there seemed to be at least some provision for people who can't stand in queues. The con also successfully enforced bans against people who have been jerks at past cons, even the kind of jerks who booked into a nearby hotel and tried to turn up anyway. They didn't allow extremely famous authors to be divas, but insisted that everybody follow policy, which has the pleasing result that the con wasn't at all dominated by a few big names but instead there was a really good range of interesting people from all backgrounds.
The main hall and dealers' room were just great, really spacious with a whole range of interesting exhibits. There were plenty of food options even within the actual con space, and a street of very nice small local eateries half a mile away. The ceremonies were well organized and entertaining and didn't drag on. They fixed the Hugo awards (yes, technically a separate organization from the con itself but very much part of the experience) and came up with something transparent and fair. My only real complaint was that most of the dances and ceilidhs took place in rooms too small for dancing, so I ended up not really joining in any of those.
In terms of content and organization that was the best con I've been to. In terms of social, it wasn't perfect but I did get to meet or meet up with several of the people I was most excited to see,
rosefox and partner,
sfred and
djm4,
khalinche, and even briefly met
kiya though we didn't get to talk much. And I hung out with lots of my Cambridge friends but not like at some cons where I've accidentally ended up travelling hundreds of miles to spend time with my local neighbours exclusively. Lobbycon kind of didn't work for me; between trying to stay masked, and the organization of programme being ironically too good (in that people spent the time between items purposefully travelling to the next thing, not stuck in queues or clustering in pinch points), I didn't get to just hang out in random spots and have chance conversations with random cool people.
And yet, I regretted going basically from the moment I arrived. I spent a lot of time fretting about how expensive it was in money, but mostly worrying about catching Covid, which in fact turned out to be founded. Even though it was good it wasn't worth the risk. I thought the Covid policy was sound (caring about ventilation, masks 'strongly recommended', everybody tests before arrival and then daily). But in fact the only part of it enforced was the 'don't hassle other people for their different approach to infection risk', and that was interpreted to mean, don't mention the plague at all. I understand that the con don't have the power to literally force people to mask and test, and some people actively can't. But they didn't communicate the policy in any way, just expected people to read the small print of the Ts&Cs, and in fact they prohibited participants from referring to the policy under the 'don't hassle other people' clause. Even ventilation was good in the main site, but terrible in the attached hotel where some of the programming took place.
Following the policy (which nobody else seemed to even know about, even people who are generally covid cautious), I tested every day and did not show positive until this morning.
jack was symptomatic on Tuesday and positive yesterday. I had very mild symptoms which could be anything yesterday, (scratchy throat, a bit sniffly) and a very faint line on the test today. So given the timing it's possible that
jack caught it right at the end of the con, and I caught it from him travelling home together on the sleeper train, when we didn't mask. And it's possible that even if I hadn't gone I would have caught plague from
jack anyway; we tried isolating from each other when he was positive and I wasn't yet, but I think it was too late by then.
The only thing that makes this slightly less bad is that I very unusually have no commitments at all for the next two weeks, so my life isn't going to be very disrupted by needing to quarantine. (Yes, I know it's not legally required, I'm doing it because it's ethical.) So if I just get an acute case with no medium- or long-term consequences, I'll be fine to go back to college for the start of term.
So, all in all, good, but not worth risking my life and livelihood :-( I won't do that again, even if my entire family are going and I want to be with them.
So yes,
On the whole it was a good con. Very well organized, I'm sure there's going to be some scandal coming out but it looked to me like they did most things right and avoided many of the pitfalls of other cons. The programming was generally really good; I didn't go to a single bad panel or talk. The worst experience I had, and this was a bit of a theme, was three really interesting and knowledgeable experts being talked over by one white male blowhard who wrote a book on a vaguely related subject. Generally the moderators were pretty good at keeping a lid on this sort of thing, but almost every good panel I went to would have been even better if that one white guy hadn't been there. (To be clear, different white guys in every case.) That is still a massive improvement on previous experiences where three random mediocre white men completely drowning out the one interesting panellist is more typical.
Events were well matched to room sizes. Not perfectly, but perfection is impossible. And the whole venue had a very very strict policy that you don't overfill rooms; I was impressed that the whole volunteer team backed up the employees in enforcing this, no 'just this once' exceptions for famous or pushy people, so they completely avoided any kind of asshole filter issues. Queues were not excessively long, and there seemed to be at least some provision for people who can't stand in queues. The con also successfully enforced bans against people who have been jerks at past cons, even the kind of jerks who booked into a nearby hotel and tried to turn up anyway. They didn't allow extremely famous authors to be divas, but insisted that everybody follow policy, which has the pleasing result that the con wasn't at all dominated by a few big names but instead there was a really good range of interesting people from all backgrounds.
The main hall and dealers' room were just great, really spacious with a whole range of interesting exhibits. There were plenty of food options even within the actual con space, and a street of very nice small local eateries half a mile away. The ceremonies were well organized and entertaining and didn't drag on. They fixed the Hugo awards (yes, technically a separate organization from the con itself but very much part of the experience) and came up with something transparent and fair. My only real complaint was that most of the dances and ceilidhs took place in rooms too small for dancing, so I ended up not really joining in any of those.
In terms of content and organization that was the best con I've been to. In terms of social, it wasn't perfect but I did get to meet or meet up with several of the people I was most excited to see,
And yet, I regretted going basically from the moment I arrived. I spent a lot of time fretting about how expensive it was in money, but mostly worrying about catching Covid, which in fact turned out to be founded. Even though it was good it wasn't worth the risk. I thought the Covid policy was sound (caring about ventilation, masks 'strongly recommended', everybody tests before arrival and then daily). But in fact the only part of it enforced was the 'don't hassle other people for their different approach to infection risk', and that was interpreted to mean, don't mention the plague at all. I understand that the con don't have the power to literally force people to mask and test, and some people actively can't. But they didn't communicate the policy in any way, just expected people to read the small print of the Ts&Cs, and in fact they prohibited participants from referring to the policy under the 'don't hassle other people' clause. Even ventilation was good in the main site, but terrible in the attached hotel where some of the programming took place.
Following the policy (which nobody else seemed to even know about, even people who are generally covid cautious), I tested every day and did not show positive until this morning.
The only thing that makes this slightly less bad is that I very unusually have no commitments at all for the next two weeks, so my life isn't going to be very disrupted by needing to quarantine. (Yes, I know it's not legally required, I'm doing it because it's ethical.) So if I just get an acute case with no medium- or long-term consequences, I'll be fine to go back to college for the start of term.
So, all in all, good, but not worth risking my life and livelihood :-( I won't do that again, even if my entire family are going and I want to be with them.
(no subject)
Date: 2024-08-15 10:26 am (UTC)I hope you and J are better soon!
(no subject)
Date: 2024-08-15 10:34 am (UTC)Do you and J have what you need to keep safe and well while isolating?
It's worth remembering to rest up extra long after even a mild bout of covid to keep long covid at bay.
Good luck for a full and fast recovery!
(no subject)
Date: 2024-08-15 10:37 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2024-08-15 10:38 am (UTC)I have a lot of thoughts about Worldcon 2024's COVID policies after managing COVID response at Worldcon 2021, and I'm afraid most of them (especially the ones I'm willing to express in public) come down to, "I'm so relieved it's not my problem any more."
(no subject)
Date: 2024-08-15 10:43 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2024-08-15 10:48 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2024-08-15 10:57 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2024-08-15 11:25 am (UTC)I am still testing negative but am skipping visiting the friend I hoped to see after the con as she is highly vulnerable :(
(no subject)
Date: 2024-08-15 12:16 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2024-08-15 12:16 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2024-08-15 12:21 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2024-08-15 12:23 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2024-08-15 12:25 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2024-08-15 12:26 pm (UTC)I did manage to find the Eicha reading though, thanks for pointing me in the right direction.
(no subject)
Date: 2024-08-15 12:42 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2024-08-15 12:58 pm (UTC)I hope you and Jack don't suffer too much and get better quickly.
(no subject)
Date: 2024-08-15 02:19 pm (UTC)I think the de facto policy was approx "no-one is prevented from taking any precautions, known infectious people are strongly encouraged not to wander about, and people are very very gently nudged to consider precautions" which is about as good a policy as I ever expect to see. But I think it's a problem that they said there was a really quite decent policy of encouraging tests and masking that they presumably had no intention of following (even though I expect everywhere to treat policies like that to be polite fiction :( ).
(no subject)
Date: 2024-08-15 03:17 pm (UTC)It was really lovely to see you and spend time with you. I hope we can do so again in less risky circumstances.
(no subject)
Date: 2024-08-15 03:44 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2024-08-15 05:10 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2024-08-15 05:54 pm (UTC)It is so so hard to keep not doing the things when everything looks just like it used to look.
(no subject)
Date: 2024-08-15 06:01 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2024-08-16 06:20 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2024-08-16 06:58 pm (UTC)Good that it was an excellent con experience, even if the tradeoff wasn't what you wanted.
(no subject)
Date: 2024-08-18 11:18 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2024-08-18 11:20 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2024-08-18 11:29 am (UTC)And yeah, eventually my motivations for international travel are going to be stronger than my motivations to avoid being in the metal tube. Worldcon was just a pure unforced error on my part. I didn't need to be there, I would have enjoyed three weeks of random pottering about more than one week of con and two weeks of being stuck at home sick.
Maybe the appearance of normality was part of what biased me; I think it's more like, I've been getting away with some travel for community work, taking my mask off for hotel breakfasts and leading services, so I started thinking not all travel is unavoidable doom. But several thousand people during a surge is a very different beast from a few dozen people during normal-post-2021 prevalence.
(no subject)
Date: 2024-08-18 12:01 pm (UTC)College says our job is to foster a collegiate atmosphere and we can't wear masks because they detract from this. (This doesn't apply to students, and a few of the Asian ones are still masking.)
They are been very generous about not enforcing the rule on me that they enforce on everyone else that we have to actually be in college. I go in on Wednesdays and mostly otherwise WFH. This is partly why I'm reluctant to jump out of the current frying pan; I don't know where I could get a comparable job that would expose me less. (My line manager has been intimating that this is up for review, but I don't think he's going to press it while I'm having mental health wobbles at him.)
(no subject)
Date: 2024-08-18 08:34 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2024-08-19 03:42 am (UTC)Part of why we didn't go to the con on Monday at all was because so many cases were being self-reported (which meant many more were going unreported) and it felt too risky. It really sucks to have to make these decisions individually instead of there being a mask mandate in place and enforced, with infrastructure support like spaces for outdoor dining and booking conference spaces with good ventilation.
Now that you mention the daily testing policy, I do vaguely recall something about that, but it wasn't reiterated before the con, and I thought it was pointless anyway. The con can't control what people do in their personal time, and in my opinion it shouldn't try. Those of us who think it's responsible to test daily at a big event will do so (L and I did) and those who don't, won't, no matter what the rules say. Also, the con wasn't giving out free tests (at least not in bulk), and getting every attendee to spend £9 on a five-pack of LFTs seemed like a clear non-starter.
I was hanging out with a friend at the Accessibility desk when a man showed up with a mask on and requested a scooter; after some back and forth, another Accessibility volunteer recognized him as someone who had been asked to leave the previous day because he'd showed up with an active, symptomatic covid infection, and was now back and claiming it was fine because he was masking and taking antivirals! He was promptly evicted, badge revoked, etc. which was actually more action than I expected to see taken, given the "live and let live" policy, but I was left struggling to comprehend the mindset that could lead to a person thinking that was okay in the first place. That's the person policies need to be made for, not folks like you who are walking around with CO2 monitors and N95 masks and a strong sense of social responsibility.
(no subject)
Date: 2024-08-19 03:48 am (UTC)I have a child in public school, and schools where I am don't enforce masking, so that's my primary risk vector and one I simply can't control. But I keep reminding myself that that's a reason to be more careful in the rest of my life, not less. It is so damn hard when everyone else is "back to normal".
(no subject)
Date: 2024-08-19 06:40 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2024-08-19 09:24 am (UTC)Seeing you was a real highlight for me too!
(no subject)
Date: 2024-08-19 11:30 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2024-08-19 01:19 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2024-08-20 04:31 pm (UTC)I'm sorry that you and Jack both got got, and I hope you both get over it quickly.
(no subject)
Date: 2024-08-24 06:31 pm (UTC)I have been really interested to see how few people I know who did / attended lots of Edinburgh Fringe shows seem to have got anything.
Normally, being in underventilated rooms with people from around the world is a recipe for getting something, but out of about 30 people I know well enough to expect to get this sort of health update from, I know of one mid-Fringe sore throat and they were testing -ve for Covid-19.
(no subject)
Date: 2024-08-28 08:49 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2024-09-04 09:43 pm (UTC)I hope you and Jack recover quickly and your symptoms stay at "scratchy throat, a bit sniffly" and clear up soon.