General update
Aug. 18th, 2007 11:41 amI've spent this week learning how to be a better microscopist. It was a very useful course; the leader, Michael Peres from RIT, is really obviously a natural teacher. And there was lots of hands-on time to try out all the new techniques and improvements he'd mentioned in the lecture part. It was also very exhausting, spending hours in a darkened room staring at tiny, tiny things and absorbing lots of new information. I thought that since I was on a course with a defined timetable (instead of doing experiments which tend to overrun), I would have plenty of time in the evenings for sorting out my trip, but I ended up so tired that I wasn't good for much.
I learned: what all the knobs and settings on a scientific microscope actually do, and what kinds of tweaking of both the microscope and the camera improve the results. That was definitely the most useful part! A few specialized imaging techniques, such as DIC and polarized imaging, as well as bits of things like darkfield and phase contrast which I was already familiar with. Most of the students were pathologists for whom phase contrast is new and exotic, but I work with cells so that's the most basic technique for me. Fluorescence imaging, which is what I actually do. Also got to play with a flashy confocal microscope, which is always fun. Basically, it's like being in a simulator which lets you fly through, say, the tubules inside a kidney in 3D. Also a lot of really useful Photoshop technique, how to make the detail clearer without interpolating anything. I do wish
compilerbitch could have been there!
It's very satisfying to be on the steep part of the learning curve, so you can see clear improvements from one day to the next. Here's an early attempt; it looks kind of pretty, but as scientific data it's hopeless. It's not properly in focus, and I had set up the camera slightly wrong so everything has a greenish tint. I was also using one of the poorest microscope and camera combinations in the classroom, but this is at least as much bad workman as bad tools! And then at the end, I started taking decent pictures and then further improving them in Photoshop, as you can see in this example. (Sorry that's so big, but at less than 900 x 900 you won't really see the effect.) I don't actually know what it's a picture of; it's some kind of very thin slice through some poor lab animal or biopsy subject's organ, with some muscle (the pink stripy bits) surrounding a gland (the purple lobed bits). I don't work with this kind of thing, but only with individual cells. The photos I took of my actual experiment (cancer cells with specific proteins labelled with fluroescent antibodies) are more interesting scientifically but less interesting visually, so I'm not showing examples.
Oh, and my boss was not too annoyed about my lack of real productivity over the summer, so while it's still a problem, it's not compounded by being "in trouble".
Not a particularly major event, but something to note: Making Light posted a link to kd lang singing Hallelujah. If you haven't heard this already, you really should; it's the first time I've been motivated to find software for saving YouTube videos (though really I only want the soundtrack, the video is just of a concert at Sidney Opera House). I am a purist about that song; I care too much about Leonard Cohen's original to like most covers. And I don't generally like kd lang all that much. But this performance is seriously awesome. And then there was some discussion about Cohen covers and I found out that the Jennifer Warnes cover album Famous blue raincoat has been rereleased. And it's even on eMusic, so now I have a copy of Warnes' duet with Cohen himself, Joan of Arc, where she sings Joan and he sings the fire.
rysmiel played it to me when I was in Montréal in 2005, and it is just about the most emotionally powerful song I have ever heard.
On the planning front, well. I tend to stress about travel more than is really required, and in this case I'm not nearly as pre-organized as I would like to be. However, I have booked all the travel from here to London via Finland, Estonia, Germany, Holland and briefly Belgium, and all the accommmodation I need at the stopover points. That's the important thing. I reckon once I'm in England I can be flexible and if some of my planned meetups don't work out, well, it's a pain that I don't get to see people I'd hoped to see, but at least I won't be stranded. And I haven't planned what I'm going to do in any of the cities on my whistle-stop tour of northern Europe. But if I'm only going to be in each city for between a few hours and a day and half, I think I can get away with just wandering around and soaking up the atmosphere, rather than going to specific Tourist Sites. (I have to do it all on a 64Mb camera memory, which should be an interesting discipline, as apparently they no longer make the cards that fit my camera.)
Not connected to anything else at all, but while I'm posting, have a link to the writer Catherynne M Valente's thoughtful and personal essay on porn.
I learned: what all the knobs and settings on a scientific microscope actually do, and what kinds of tweaking of both the microscope and the camera improve the results. That was definitely the most useful part! A few specialized imaging techniques, such as DIC and polarized imaging, as well as bits of things like darkfield and phase contrast which I was already familiar with. Most of the students were pathologists for whom phase contrast is new and exotic, but I work with cells so that's the most basic technique for me. Fluorescence imaging, which is what I actually do. Also got to play with a flashy confocal microscope, which is always fun. Basically, it's like being in a simulator which lets you fly through, say, the tubules inside a kidney in 3D. Also a lot of really useful Photoshop technique, how to make the detail clearer without interpolating anything. I do wish
It's very satisfying to be on the steep part of the learning curve, so you can see clear improvements from one day to the next. Here's an early attempt; it looks kind of pretty, but as scientific data it's hopeless. It's not properly in focus, and I had set up the camera slightly wrong so everything has a greenish tint. I was also using one of the poorest microscope and camera combinations in the classroom, but this is at least as much bad workman as bad tools! And then at the end, I started taking decent pictures and then further improving them in Photoshop, as you can see in this example. (Sorry that's so big, but at less than 900 x 900 you won't really see the effect.) I don't actually know what it's a picture of; it's some kind of very thin slice through some poor lab animal or biopsy subject's organ, with some muscle (the pink stripy bits) surrounding a gland (the purple lobed bits). I don't work with this kind of thing, but only with individual cells. The photos I took of my actual experiment (cancer cells with specific proteins labelled with fluroescent antibodies) are more interesting scientifically but less interesting visually, so I'm not showing examples.
Oh, and my boss was not too annoyed about my lack of real productivity over the summer, so while it's still a problem, it's not compounded by being "in trouble".
Not a particularly major event, but something to note: Making Light posted a link to kd lang singing Hallelujah. If you haven't heard this already, you really should; it's the first time I've been motivated to find software for saving YouTube videos (though really I only want the soundtrack, the video is just of a concert at Sidney Opera House). I am a purist about that song; I care too much about Leonard Cohen's original to like most covers. And I don't generally like kd lang all that much. But this performance is seriously awesome. And then there was some discussion about Cohen covers and I found out that the Jennifer Warnes cover album Famous blue raincoat has been rereleased. And it's even on eMusic, so now I have a copy of Warnes' duet with Cohen himself, Joan of Arc, where she sings Joan and he sings the fire.
On the planning front, well. I tend to stress about travel more than is really required, and in this case I'm not nearly as pre-organized as I would like to be. However, I have booked all the travel from here to London via Finland, Estonia, Germany, Holland and briefly Belgium, and all the accommmodation I need at the stopover points. That's the important thing. I reckon once I'm in England I can be flexible and if some of my planned meetups don't work out, well, it's a pain that I don't get to see people I'd hoped to see, but at least I won't be stranded. And I haven't planned what I'm going to do in any of the cities on my whistle-stop tour of northern Europe. But if I'm only going to be in each city for between a few hours and a day and half, I think I can get away with just wandering around and soaking up the atmosphere, rather than going to specific Tourist Sites. (I have to do it all on a 64Mb camera memory, which should be an interesting discipline, as apparently they no longer make the cards that fit my camera.)
Not connected to anything else at all, but while I'm posting, have a link to the writer Catherynne M Valente's thoughtful and personal essay on porn.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-08-18 12:09 pm (UTC)Hallelujah & Joan of Arc
Date: 2007-08-18 01:08 pm (UTC)May I contribute to your online salon, links to those versions of each recorded (live, first/single-take), by the Canadian musician Allison Crowe (whom I enjoy the pleasure of serving):
Hallelujah ~
http://www.allisoncrowe.com/AllisonCroweTidingsHallelujah.mp3
Joan of Arc ~
http://www.allisoncrowe.com/JoanOfArc128.mp3
(no subject)
Date: 2007-08-18 02:58 pm (UTC)I'm really in two minds about whether I approve of this sort of thing or not. The fact that you were upfront about your connection with Crowe means that on balance I'm prepared to leave your comment in place and lend my modest audience to your publicity campaign.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-08-18 04:10 pm (UTC)Wait, you mean I never played it for you??
Also, Joan Baez does a good cover of just "Famous Blue Raincoat."
(no subject)
Date: 2007-08-18 04:17 pm (UTC)And thanks for replying to my Facebook message. I will tell my parents to contact your parents directly; working through me is going to be stupid when I'm about to go offline!
(no subject)
Date: 2007-08-18 04:58 pm (UTC)That doesn't make any sense, though, if I never played the Jennifer Warnes CD for you, since that's the only Leonard Cohen stuff I have. I didn't play you "A Singer Must Die"? Or "First We Take Manhattan" (or whatever it's called)?
And I believe that the Joan Baez cover of FBR is on Diamonds and Rust in the Bullring, but it could be that it's on Diamonds and Rust, I'm not sure. (I'm too lazy to check on her site, sorry.)
(no subject)
Date: 2007-08-18 07:52 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-08-18 09:06 pm (UTC)but that Joan of Arc I would not have forgotten
I can see that, but then there are certain things one would think I'd never have forgotten that, per a discussion of ours the other day, I clearly did! ;)
(no subject)
Date: 2007-08-18 06:23 pm (UTC)I'm just a person who loves music, loves great artistry, and loves sharing such creative excitement. The stated nature and purpose of your livejournal suggests you're open to the world. And, it's remarkable that you mention both Hallelujah and Joan of Arc.
I don't know of another artist, apart from Leonard, who happens to have recorded both of those songs.
It's all about the music. If you do any searching about who I am - you'll understand my motivation. May you enjoy the contribution ( :
(no subject)
Date: 2007-08-18 08:00 pm (UTC)It's because your comment made you sound like an interesting person that I started poking around, and found lots and lots of press releases about how you're revolutionizing music marketing, which made me kind of suspicious. But if you want to hang around and talk about whatever happens to interest you, you're very welcome. I don't automatically hate PR people!
(no subject)
Date: 2007-08-18 08:20 pm (UTC)It can be a delicate balance, being a believer and doing what one can to help artists - be that for love or money. In my case it's the former, but, who's to know and say when one just meets. PR hacks, street teamers and passionate patrons of the arts can all sound the same online in bytes.
I shall be happy to explore when I can, and will contribute if and when appropriate and meaningful.
Sláinte mhaith!
(no subject)
Date: 2007-08-19 10:19 am (UTC)You did not read this comment.
Date: 2007-08-19 10:33 am (UTC)Oh dear, how did this link happen to be lying around in my LJ? I can't imagine how it got there. *cough*
Re: You did not read this comment.
Date: 2007-08-19 02:09 pm (UTC)It is indeed very moving. I have a slight prejudice against Cohen because sometimes his vocal production grates, but many of his songs are wonderful and I like singing them myself. *makes note to revive Cohen covers somehow*