liv: alternating calligraphed and modern letters (letters)
[personal profile] liv
Not exactly a shitpost, but an entirely frivolous poll. While I have an influx of new readers!

Consider the expression They can't see the wood for the trees:

Open to: Registered Users, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 89


Do you know the expression?

View Answers

I am not familiar with the expression
7 (8.2%)

I am familiar with the expression
78 (91.8%)

The 'wood' which someone can't see represents:

View Answers

Important features
21 (24.7%)

Minor features
1 (1.2%)

Details
3 (3.5%)

The big picture
78 (91.8%)

Superficial features
2 (2.4%)

Features which require attention to notice
2 (2.4%)

When I think of the 'wood', I imagine

View Answers

The substance that the trees are made of
12 (14.6%)

The area of land where the trees are growing
70 (85.4%)

Ticky

View Answers

Tickybox
59 (85.5%)

I wish to complain about this poll
15 (21.7%)

(no subject)

Date: 2019-02-07 06:15 pm (UTC)
batrachian: A frog, probably of South American vintage (Default)
From: [personal profile] batrachian
Oh, yes, I *like* the ambiguity and certainly, no poll without it. Just wanted to highlight a possible regional...something.

(no subject)

Date: 2019-02-07 06:19 pm (UTC)
melannen: Commander Valentine of Alpha Squad Seven, a red-haired female Nick Fury in space, smoking contemplatively (Default)
From: [personal profile] melannen
I wonder if it's a UK vs. US thing; I know there's differences in the meanings of words like "forest" and "wood" in general across the pond. (Which is actually super-fascinating in terms of the land use history and the mythmaking around it in the two countries!)

(no subject)

Date: 2019-02-07 07:06 pm (UTC)
From: [personal profile] ewt
In Canada I heard both "forest" and "wood" with "forest" significantly more; in the UK I have mostly heard "wood" but "wood" here definitely seems to mean "forest" much more strongly than it does in North America.

(no subject)

Date: 2019-02-07 07:07 pm (UTC)
steorra: Restaurant sign that says Palatal (palatal)
From: [personal profile] steorra
Hm, this Canadian doesn't recall hearing the saying with "wood".

(no subject)

Date: 2019-02-07 07:10 pm (UTC)
From: [personal profile] ewt
I moved a lot and have some pretty recent British ancestry. Annoyingly, I can't figure out if "wood" was a thing I heard in New Brunswick but not in the prairies, or if it was a thing I heard from my mother but not other adults.

Certainly I was aware from a young age that "wood" could mean "a place with lots of trees in it" because I knew that Winnie the Pooh lived in the Hundred Acre Wood. (I didn't know what acres were until rather later.)

(no subject)

Date: 2019-02-07 07:46 pm (UTC)
steorra: Restaurant sign that says Palatal (palatal)
From: [personal profile] steorra
I'm from BC, so it could totally be regional within Canada.

(no subject)

Date: 2019-02-07 08:36 pm (UTC)
siderea: (Default)
From: [personal profile] siderea
First time I ever heard it not forest was this poll.

(New Englander, with 1980s sojourn in Northern California.)

(no subject)

Date: 2019-02-07 08:40 pm (UTC)
rosefox: Green books on library shelves. (Default)
From: [personal profile] rosefox
Ditto. Grew up in NYC, one American parent, one British parent.

(no subject)

Date: 2019-02-08 12:51 am (UTC)
genarti: Spreading oak branches in a park or clearing. ([misc] crooked bough and bee-loud glade)
From: [personal profile] genarti
Same here!

(US, from Ohio and New England; we had a lot of British family friends when I was growing up, but I can't recall ever hearing them use this idiom to know which variant they night have used.)

I do agree that if I were to say "wood," I'd actually say "woods" -- but really it's such a fixed expression to me that it'd feel weird to not just say forest. I had no idea this was a regionalism!

(no subject)

Date: 2019-02-08 02:59 am (UTC)
rushthatspeaks: (Default)
From: [personal profile] rushthatspeaks
+1.

(no subject)

Date: 2019-02-08 02:11 pm (UTC)
mrissa: (Default)
From: [personal profile] mrissa
Same.

(no subject)

Date: 2019-02-08 10:40 pm (UTC)
azurelunatic: Vivid pink Alaskan wild rose. (Default)
From: [personal profile] azurelunatic
Ditto.

I have heard "wood" meaning the collection of trees, but never in this saying.

(no subject)

Date: 2019-02-07 07:07 pm (UTC)
sciatrix: A thumbnail from an Escher print, black and white, of a dragon with its tail in its mouth, wing outstretched behind. (Default)
From: [personal profile] sciatrix
US person, and I've always heard forest. Actually, if I was to use this version, I would specifically say "can't see the woods for the trees." In this context, using the singular "a wood" to me connotates a sort of poetic usage, not an everyday aphoristic "those woods right there" sort.

(no subject)

Date: 2019-02-07 07:30 pm (UTC)
melannen: Commander Valentine of Alpha Squad Seven, a red-haired female Nick Fury in space, smoking contemplatively (Default)
From: [personal profile] melannen
It really does seem to be a true dialect difference!

I think of "forest" as connoting, in addition to "a bunch of trees together" also something along the lines of "untamed/unmanaged wilderness" - which of course it generally isn't, even out West, it's either managed or abandoned but previously cultivated/managed, but it's part of the national myth that it is.

"The woods" actually seems less poetic, and also, like, smaller? It could just mean the same thing as "forest" but I wouldn't call, for example, the half-acre of unmanaged trees at the back of a park a "forest", but I might call it "the woods", like, "I think a bobcat lives in the woods down by the crick" or something, whereas the woods down by the crick are not nearly majestic enough to rate "forest".

"Wood" singular to mean "group of trees" is either deliberately poetic/archaic/British, or very rarely it's short for "woodlot" and is definitely heavily managed.

(no subject)

Date: 2019-02-08 03:02 am (UTC)
rushthatspeaks: (Default)
From: [personal profile] rushthatspeaks
Dialectically (Midwestern U.S. now living in northeastern U.S.), where I was growing up a forest specifically means something thick enough that you can't see into it more than a foot or so because of undergrowth, overgrowth, closeness of trees, and so on. Anything else was woods. 'Wood' does not exist as a term in that area and I initially learned the variant through poetry.

Wood v. Woods

Date: 2019-02-20 06:13 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I have never known the idiom as "Not out of the woods." For me, the only usage for this phrase is the singular tense.

Southernwood

Soundbite

Miscellaneous. Eclectic. Random. Perhaps markedly literate, or at least suffering from the compulsion to read any text that presents itself, including cereal boxes.

Page Summary

Top topics

December 2025

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930 31   

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags

Subscription Filters