![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I thought I'd post the best of the crop my attempts at taking photos of sunsets and other interesting lighting conditions when I was in England mid-December:

I've included with this lot, though it doesn't quite fit, a photo I took of Dundee when
lethargic_man was here in November:

Also, a couple of photos of my parents' place:

Theoretically, you should only be able to see those if you're on my friends list, but I'm not sure how well the security is working. Anyway, the main claim to fame of that house is that Rupert Brooke (who was a regular visitor) described it in his diary as a "castellated mansion", and I think these photos show that quite well. Well, the other claim to fame is that the Macaulays lived there, but they are quite limitedly famous compared to Brooke!
I've included with this lot, though it doesn't quite fit, a photo I took of Dundee when
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Also, a couple of photos of my parents' place:
Theoretically, you should only be able to see those if you're on my friends list, but I'm not sure how well the security is working. Anyway, the main claim to fame of that house is that Rupert Brooke (who was a regular visitor) described it in his diary as a "castellated mansion", and I think these photos show that quite well. Well, the other claim to fame is that the Macaulays lived there, but they are quite limitedly famous compared to Brooke!
(no subject)
Date: 2005-01-01 01:02 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-01-03 04:20 pm (UTC)Thank you!
I got some very nice photos of sunset over Florence when I went to visit
It's fun when these things work out, isn't it? I think probably a lot of skies look quite similar at the same time of year and with a near enough similar climate.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-01-01 01:08 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-01-01 01:14 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-01-02 01:24 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-01-02 01:57 pm (UTC)Yes, my originals are at 1200 x 800. I just thought that was too big for the web. You can certainly have a copy if you want. Did your picture of the shimmering lights from around the same time come out?
I think it may benefit from size.
I'm not so sure about this; I kind of like the smaller version, because it's an image where there's not a lot of detail, just large areas of colour. (You did click on my link to the medium-sized version, right, you're not talking about just the thumbnail?)
(no subject)
Date: 2005-01-02 02:00 pm (UTC)Yes, please; and then I can make the decision about the optimum size for it. :o)
Did your picture of the shimmering lights from around the same time come out?
I didn't take one; it was Shabbos, remember?
You did click on my link to the medium-sized version, right, you're not talking about just the thumbnail?
Yup.