Went to hear a talk about how different mutations in the same gene (to do with the semi-rigid network that holds cell nuclei together) can cause a whole range of different diseases: neurological degeneration, heart failure, muscular dystrophies, premature ageing, and problems of fat metabolism. Apparently in one form of the last, patients with inherited mutations are normal until puberty, and then lose most of their subcutaneous fat, instead accumulating body fat in the liver and pancreas. They end up with problems similar to diabetes and chronic heart failure, due to too much fat in places it's not supposed to be as well as too little where it's meant to be.
We heard that the condition is far more readily diagnosed in girls than boys, and indeed that a girl will often be picked up and then her brothers turn out to have the same problem when investigated. Why? Because if a teenaged boy suddenly loses all the fat from his limbs, the uncovered muscles give the appearance of being "cut", and prominent muscles are desirable for teenaged boys. But if a similar process happens to a girl, she panics because her arms and legs are becoming all ugly and muscly, and rushes to the doctor.
The (American) lecturer regarded this as vaguely amusing. But I find it really rather sad, the idea that having visible muscles is such a terrible tragedy for girls. (OK, in this case it is the symptom of a serious disease, but in the early stages there's no reason to think that.) It makes me wonder just how many girls are avoiding doing exercise to make sure their limbs stay soft and unmuscular.
We heard that the condition is far more readily diagnosed in girls than boys, and indeed that a girl will often be picked up and then her brothers turn out to have the same problem when investigated. Why? Because if a teenaged boy suddenly loses all the fat from his limbs, the uncovered muscles give the appearance of being "cut", and prominent muscles are desirable for teenaged boys. But if a similar process happens to a girl, she panics because her arms and legs are becoming all ugly and muscly, and rushes to the doctor.
The (American) lecturer regarded this as vaguely amusing. But I find it really rather sad, the idea that having visible muscles is such a terrible tragedy for girls. (OK, in this case it is the symptom of a serious disease, but in the early stages there's no reason to think that.) It makes me wonder just how many girls are avoiding doing exercise to make sure their limbs stay soft and unmuscular.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-22 03:39 pm (UTC)Having said that, on the bright side I've never heard of girls avoiding exercise for that reason, since you have to do a great deal of exercise to develop obvious muscles. Most of the ones I know go to the gym in droves because they are terrified of becoming overweight, which is... hang on... equally depressing. Oh dear!
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-22 03:50 pm (UTC)A couple of times I've joined a gym (I think it's probably a good idea in theory to keep fit, but the practice never quite pans out) and when you do the induction they just *assume* that because I'm female I don't want to do weights, and that they'll have to persuade me to do any at all, because of this fear of muscly bulking up.
I agree that it's sad! Who says what we should look like?
Maybe this view arose (subconsciously) because men are seen as the people who "should" be going out doing things (developing muscle thereby) while women "should" be at home doing the baking (unless it's very heavy cake, probably not much muscling involved).
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-22 03:54 pm (UTC)But I have never been to any other gym, so this one may have been atypical - I don't know.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-22 04:05 pm (UTC)And I should say that the list of gyms I've joined is also very small (two!) so statistically we're not a great sample :)
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-22 05:50 pm (UTC)- A thing called the Boa Constrictor, which is basically a very thick strip of rubber with one end firmly attached to a handle and the other end passing through an adjacent slot. Tighten it round the top of a jar or bottle, and it will grip it very nicely for you. I can open most jars with this.
- A handy little lever thingamajig that breaks the vacuum seal on jars; if the Boa Constrictor doesn't work first time, that will usually sort it.
- A stippled gripper pad (ooh, assonance!) made of silicone. Since this is also heatproof, it has a multitude of uses.
I did also have an electric can opener, but I very rarely use cans these days and the ones I do use have a pull tab, which I find easier (though I have another gadget for dealing with more recalcitrant pull tabs, which I occasionally need). Generally I get my gadgets from Lakeland Limited (http://www.lakeland.co.uk/), who are a good kitchenware firm in general, and in particular very thoughtful about catering for the slightly less abled. :-)
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-22 05:59 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-22 08:01 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-22 08:06 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-23 11:14 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-22 04:09 pm (UTC)Nobody except that original gym employee has ever suggested I don't belong in there, but from just her, and lack of encouragement, it took me a while to go in there and start using that equipment, which I learned I like.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-23 12:16 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-22 04:21 pm (UTC)I often hate that female tennis players are so much hyped for their looks but, at the same time, I think it's good that women who look strong are still considered sexy - Sharapova may have long blonde hair but still looks like she could kick your arse if you pissed her off!
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-22 04:44 pm (UTC)So while I despair over teenage girls trying not to appear smart, I'm less worried about teenage girls trying not to become muscly — if you look at what sort of extra-curricular activities the "pretty, popular" girls are involved in, it's often going to be things like cheerleading, which actually takes a lot of muscle, aerobic activity, etc.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-22 07:13 pm (UTC)I kind of resent the fact that no matter how strong I could be (not very, at the moment LOL), it never shows in terms of muscle definition. Meh.
But that's my personal opinion.
Of course it is sad that both men and women are subject to these pressures. Oy.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-22 09:27 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-22 09:29 pm (UTC)Of course, as for curious individual cases, I have impressed guys with my stomach muscles more than once (although admittedly, I'm still squishy enough).
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-23 10:57 am (UTC)i dunno. i'm not totally typical physique, as a teenager i had pretty full-on defined muscles in my arms and legs, but no-one ever commented on them in a negative way. in the 'old days' women were supposed to be soft and feminine - to me weak and submissive, but perhaps also because they tend to be softer naturally? (sorry if i am believing a myth here). i have had negative comments in China and Taiwan. but i think of the influence of films like Terminator and Alien - i think they made mainstream-acceptance of muscly women, 20-odd years ago, not just acceptable but desirable too.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-23 01:47 pm (UTC)http://current.com/items/89830244/sarah_haskins_in_target_women_skin_care.htm