Coming out

Nov. 12th, 2015 08:55 am
liv: bacterial conjugation (attached)
[personal profile] liv
I missed National (nation of internet?) Coming Out Day, partly because I was busy, and partly because it wasn't the right time to make this post.

There's an archetypal story about what Coming Out means, and I think this story or something like is behind the idea of National Coming Out Day. The idea is that the person goes to their parents and says, "Mum, Dad, I have something to tell you: I'm gay". And the parents react, either positively (plenty of glurge stories around the internet where they say something supportive like "we'll always love and support you no matter what" or "we were wondering when you'd tell us"), or negatively. And either way, it's done, the person is officially Out.

There are several problems with this. It assumes that everybody has exactly two heterosexual parents who are currently in a relationship with eachother, and the kind of relationship with said parents where it's important that they know your sexual orientation, but not the kind where that would come up in casual conversation rather than having to be a big announcement. And it assumes that people have a fixed, even innate, sexual orientation, usually something that can be described with a single word, and once they've decided what that is, that's their identity fixed for the rest of time. I think the biggest problem with the story is that even where all the other assumptions are valid, it isn't realistic to define Out or Closeted as a binary. Pretty much everybody I know who belongs to any kind of gender or sexual minority is more out in some areas of their life than others. Even people who are massively open about who they are, well, society makes heteronormative assumptions, so unless you tell every single person you interact with, hi, I'm $identity, there will be people who think you're straight and cis and binary gendered and conduct your relationships according to the standard pattern.

Recently came across on Tumblr one of those Ian McKellen being adorable gifsets that Tumblr is so good for. Transcript:
Sometimes I'm in a cab, there's a driver about my age, and he might say: "Have you got any grandchildren, Ian?" And I think: "Do I have to start telling him that I'm gay, and at the age when I might have become a parent, it was illegal to be gay?" So I make a decision in the back of a car, aged 76: "Am I going to have to come out to this stranger?" And of course sometimes I say: "No mate, I'm gay!" And he says: "Well, so am I!" The world has changed so much for the better.
I mean, I'm wary of the It gets better narrative too, because yes, rich famous white gay men can be open about their sexuality and their relationships and that genuinely is great, but there are still an awful lot of people suffering violence and hatred because of their gender expression or sexuality. The thing is, even in this better world, even for the people for whom coming out is largely a positive experience, and I include myself in that category, it's not a one time thing, it's a constant ongoing calculation all the time.

I happened to see some grumpy straight binary people on FB complaining about think pieces about experiences of homophobic and gender policing microaggressions. They said something like, why do these people always have to go on about their gender or sexuality, why can't they just get on with life without playing identity politics and making a big deal out of labels? Well, the answer is because IME every time you don't explicitly state that you're different from the default, people will assume you're straight and cis and all the rest. And sometimes that's ok, I don't in fact think that being bi is the most important fact about my life, if a random shop assistant making small talk assumes I'm straight, that's not a big deal. But what about people I interact with repeatedly, work colleagues, people at synagogue, readers of my blogs I don't otherwise know particularly well? I don't have a neutral choice, I either have to hide some part of my life, or I have to Come Out at some point. (People who don't read / pass as straight at all will have very different experiences from me, of course, but National Coming Out Day isn't really targeted at them either.)

Honestly, even with specific people I haven't found Coming Out to be a one-time, binary thing. People forget, or they don't really take in the implications of what you told them, and you find yourself having to remind them that you're Queer. And I can understand how that comes across as always going on about your identity, but there's such a huge gravitational pull towards re-closeting yourself if you don't do that. I never said to my parents, "Mum, Dad, I have something to tell you: I'm bisexual". Instead I told them I was in a relationship with a woman (having previously dated a male partner so they weren't too likely to assume I was a lesbian). And they reacted pretty well, on the whole, they said the right things about loving and supporting me, but they were also a bit bemused (this was the 90s and there just wasn't that much information available unless you went looking for it). But then there was a long awkward phase where they didn't really take my girlfriend seriously as a partner, and only gradually got used to the idea that I'm bi. Which I'm not saying to criticize them at all, I am really proud and grateful for how well my parents handled the information, even though it was a pretty new concept to them. There was a similar period of uncertainty, awkwardness and eventual adjustment when I told them I was engaged to my male partner, by the way, so it's not that they were homophobic, just that telling your parents some life-changing new information isn't as simple as media Coming Out stories.

These days Coming Out isn't just about sitting down and having a conversation with your parents; people make social media announcements. And again, that runs into the problem of, if you don't make a big announcement you are closeted by default as people will assume, but if you do, you're over-focusing on some aspect of your identity, that in our brave new world of happy acceptance maybe shouldn't need to be a big deal. A couple of well-known columnists recently came out as genderqueer, and wrote some rather poignant essays: Laurie Penny on How to be a genderqueer feminist and Jack Monroe asks, Please don't call me a girl.

So with that preamble, I too, a much lesser writer than Penny or Monroe, have something to tell you: I am polyamorous. That is to say, I'm currently in romantic relationships with several different people, all of whom know about eachother and are completely happy and supportive. I don't think this is likely to be a surprise to most of my readers; I've not been making huge efforts to keep it a secret, and I'm sure many of you whom I haven't told directly will have found it easy enough to read between the lines. But this is the first time I've actually said the sentence, I'm poly, on my public blog. And part of why I'm saying it now is that it's not only a fact about my philosophy of relationship, and I'm not even sure it's a fact about my identity at all, poly is more a thing I do than who I am. It's also a fact about my life and the people who are important to me.

A year ago I became part of a quad, four people who are in relationships with eachother in various combinations. And it's been a completely wonderful year, full of new experiences, and we're all really hopeful that this can be a long-term, potentially a committed thing. When I was poly in the sense that I had various shapes of romantic-ish connections alongside my primary relationship, it didn't matter so much, partly because I don't identify as poly as such. People knew who I loved and who I was close to, and that was great, and it wasn't really anybody's business but the people involved exactly what form those loving relationships took. Now that I'm part of a quad, it feels like a different situation. Unlike with being bi, it's not that people need to know this fact about me and who I am, it's that I want people to know whom I love and the relationship structure I'm in. Every time in the past year I've referred to, or even introduced, my partners as "my friend" instead of "my partner" I've cringed internally; it's like going back 20 years and playing the pronoun game because I wasn't sure how safe it was to come out.

The thing about coming out about relationship structures rather than identities is that you're telling other people's secrets. The other three people in the quad needed to be free to make their own decisions about when and what to tell their respective parents. I told my own parents as soon as I was reasonably confident that the relationship was stable and not just a passing fling, and as when I told them I was dating a woman, they said supportive things and didn't entirely understand what I meant and have been slowly coming to terms with the idea that I'm in this multi-person relationship network instead of the dyad they expected when I got married. But, well, four people have a lot of parents between them, and part of why I missed National Coming Out Day was I didn't want to put anything on the internet until all the parents had been informed directly.

And even now I've made this post, I haven't just flipped the switch to being Out instead of Closeted. It's not that hard to connect this journal to my wallet name if you go digging, but I hope that a cursory web search on my wallet name isn't going to find this pseudonymous blog. I'm not out at work and I have no immediate plans to be; I'll carry on saying "spending some time with... friends" when people ask me about my plans for the weekend. And I'm not fully out within the Jewish community (though I'm out to individual Jewish people including obviously my parents), and both those things mean that I'm not likely any time soon to mention poly on Facebook.

In some ways being out about poly feels more scary than telling people I'm bi. That's partly because I've been lucky that I've experienced relatively little homophobia or biphobia. And I generally hang out with liberal tolerant types who at worst accept the culturally prevalent idea that gay people are just like "us" except that they happen to be attracted to the same gender. Poly in that sense is less "normal"; there are many people who generally see themselves as non-judgemental but have no paradigm at all for multiple or multi-person relationships other than having affairs and deceiving or cheating on one's (singular) partner. Even some LGBT campaigners and activists are so fixated on the assimilationist paradigm of "just like heteronormative dyadic relationships" that they are eager to distance themselves from any kind of poly or open relationship situation. But at the same time, although it's harder to tell people about my relationships with several people than it is to tell them about my (past) relationships with women, it still feels like it's my choices that are being disapproved of, not that I'm being oppressed because of something I just can't change about myself.

Anyway, I'm very happy and in love, that's the other thing I wanted to say, aside from all this political and angsty stuff. It's been a wonderful amazing year, in so many ways.

Please feel free to ask questions; I personally don't mind being a resource if you've not had much exposure to poly relationships before now. As you can see from this post, I'm being a bit cagey about the actual identities of my partners, but if you ask me general questions that I can answer without disrupting anyone else's privacy, I'll do my best.

(no subject)

Date: 2015-11-12 10:27 am (UTC)
andrewducker: (Default)
From: [personal profile] andrewducker
Congrats on finding a situation that makes you happy. I really hope that it's working well for you, and I'm glad your parents are accepting (if confused).

I agree that (many) people tend to be more confused than with non-heterosexuality. And I think part of that is representation. We've had LGBT people on TV for decades, but I can't think of any polyamorous relationships. And yeah, I've seen people leap immediately to either assuming that people are cheating, or that they have an open or swingers relationship a lot.

I hope that people are nice to you, and this doesn't cause too much drama.

(no subject)

Date: 2015-11-12 09:02 pm (UTC)
andrewducker: (Default)
From: [personal profile] andrewducker
I don't think any of us can control who we fall for - and people come along at the most unexpected times. It sounds like everyone involved has taken it seriously, thought about it a lot, and are presumably communicating well. (Which, from my experience, is what makes poly work - huge amounts of communication so that nobody feels treated badly.)

(no subject)

Date: 2015-11-12 10:42 am (UTC)
sfred: Grant, me and David (poly)
From: [personal profile] sfred
Congratulations, and thank you for writing about this.

(no subject)

Date: 2015-11-12 02:15 pm (UTC)
sfred: Grant, me and David (poly)
From: [personal profile] sfred
Aw, thank you. This is my poly icon but only has two of my partners so I don't use it very often! The picture was taken at my sister's wedding (my other partner was there but wasn't yet my partner).

(no subject)

Date: 2015-11-12 11:42 am (UTC)
vatine: Generated with some CL code and a hand-designed blackletter font (Default)
From: [personal profile] vatine
Good that everyone involved are happy, long may this continue.

(no subject)

Date: 2015-11-12 04:08 pm (UTC)
seekingferret: Two warning signs one above the other. 1) Falling Rocks. 2) Falling Rocs. (Default)
From: [personal profile] seekingferret
Glad you are happy!

Would be curious to hear any thoughts on how your polyamory relates to your Judaism... polyamory (polygamy specifically, I suppose, in general) is a rather complicated question for halachic Judaism.

(no subject)

Date: 2015-11-12 04:10 pm (UTC)
seekingferret: Two warning signs one above the other. 1) Falling Rocks. 2) Falling Rocs. (Default)
From: [personal profile] seekingferret
In particular, any insights on these parshiyot we are reading now about the complexities of plural marriage... Sarah and Hagar and Avraham, Leah and Rachel and Bilhah and Zilpa and Yaakov?

(no subject)

Date: 2015-11-12 07:18 pm (UTC)
seekingferret: Two warning signs one above the other. 1) Falling Rocks. 2) Falling Rocs. (Default)
From: [personal profile] seekingferret
... and even though you invited questions, somehow these questions feel a little bit rude to me, so please feel free to decline to answer them if you don't wish to.

(no subject)

Date: 2015-11-12 09:03 pm (UTC)
seekingferret: Two warning signs one above the other. 1) Falling Rocks. 2) Falling Rocs. (Default)
From: [personal profile] seekingferret
Yeah, I've not studied Rabbenu Gershom's cherem either, which is probably why when you posted inviting questions I didn't stop to think before I took it as an opportunity to think and ask questions about a part of Judaism that I don't often think much about. Again, I'm sorry, it seems obvious in retrospect how intrusive and personal my questions were, and I appreciate you answering anyway. It's really generous of you.

Sometimes textual geekery jumps ahead of reason... I might analogize it to sending away the mother bird, where I've heard people talk about finding a nest and rushing to try to send away the mother in their excitement about the rare opportunity to do such a geeky mitzvah, and only afterward realizing that now they have to figure out how to cook the egg and eat it, and did they really want to eat the egg that badly to begin with, and isn't it still pretty cruel to the mother bird?

(no subject)

Date: 2015-11-13 03:08 pm (UTC)
seekingferret: Two warning signs one above the other. 1) Falling Rocks. 2) Falling Rocs. (Default)
From: [personal profile] seekingferret
People do ask all kinds of bizarre things when I'm the first Jewish person they've ever met and I make a pretty big assumption of good faith and try to answer if I can.

I have the same impulse for the same reasons, and I'm sorry for taking advantage of yours.

(no subject)

Date: 2015-11-12 10:41 pm (UTC)
hatam_soferet: (Default)
From: [personal profile] hatam_soferet
Not speaking for Liv here, but...one might articulate it as:

* in general, love is a good thing, and so is sex, and we are generally in favour of maximising goodness in one's life (see also: tikkun olam manifest in love)
* most of civil halakha (bein adam lehavero rather than bein adam lemakom) is basically formulated around "respect other people, don't destabilise communities, and don't be an asshole"

So if poly is your thing and you can make it work without hurting the people in the relationship, and it's not destabilising to the community (I mean more in the civil sense than the freaking-out sense), it's not inherently incompatible with being a good Jew.

Like, having lots of wives and concubines in contexts where that's normal, that's fine--but it wasn't working in the Rabeinu Gershom context because it was too far detatched from the dominant culture.

The patriarchal marriages are distressing because they're setups where people can't observe the commandment of "respect other people." But one can't really fault the matriarchs for that, it's not that easy to be chill and respectful when you live in a society that sees you as a possession. See particularly Rachel and Leah on that one, the bit where Leah is obsessively churning out babies and saying "Maybe THIS time my husband will love me"--that's messed up but Leah's not got options, really.

So that's a possible philosophy of fitting contemporary poly into contemporary halakha, but I've not taken the time to articulate it in halakhic language. Partly because halakhic development seems to work by just quietly dropping the bits it doesn't wanna do (see: lending at interest, failing to pay day workers daily) and justifying it in halakhic language after the social reality has shifted. We're in a shift period as regards this.

(no subject)

Date: 2015-11-13 01:45 pm (UTC)
hatam_soferet: (Default)
From: [personal profile] hatam_soferet
Nu nu, advanced things doesn't mean one ought to neglect tanakh! Bloody geography. Mind you, now Shabbat is so early...what do you do late Friday nights? Like 10pm kind of late when it's still before supper here.

Anyway, shift period--I meant a LONG shift, like 100 years. We've made lots of progress on untraditional partners, and we might make more.

(no subject)

Date: 2015-11-12 10:25 pm (UTC)
ayebydan: by <user name="pureimagination"> (hg)
From: [personal profile] ayebydan
Thank you for sharing and I'm glad you felt comfortable enough to do so. I was able to read between the lines before so it is nice to be trusted with that information on a platform such as this. In some ways I think places like these can be easier to 'come out' in and at other times harder. I do think the term 'come out' feels very brash. It implies that by doing so the person changes where I feel it is more that the labels society thinks we should involve ourselves with are shared.

I have a love hate relationship with labels. On the one hand I don't see how they are anyone's business and on the other I understand how they help social relations form. I also know how strange it can be to not find yourself fitting the labels society presents us with. People call asexuality, for example a 'tumblr sexuality' and yes a lot of information on it grew from there but the way loads of people went 'hey...wait...that...YES' was clearly nothing about being hip or trendy or whatever they are calling it these days.

Omg back to you. Ahem. I hope that your other partners had as good results with their parents as you did with your own! Are you all in relationships with each other or are there a partners within the dynamic that are not in romantic relationships with? I understand if you don't want to delve into that further. I merely ask from curiosity as it is not something that is talked about often and frankly the only example of poly I can remember seeing on tv or films that I have seen have been 'big love' and that was a mormon man with 3 sister wives which I very much doubt is representative! It is the stereotype that is most known though.

If you do feel comfortable and of course with the consent of your partners any details of your day to day lives and how you work together going forward on your journal would certainly be informative. ♥

(no subject)

Date: 2015-11-13 03:16 am (UTC)
redbird: photo of the SF Bay bridges, during rebuilding after an earthquate (bay bridges)
From: [personal profile] redbird
I think it's worth looking at which labels provoke that "labels are nobody's business" reaction and which don't: if "girlfriend" or "lover" provokes that, but "husband" or "math teacher" or "mother" doesn't, what does that imply? There are a lot of different ways to be someone's mother, a lot of shapes of mother/child relationships, but that doesn't lead people to say, or think, that I shouldn't say "this is my mother" rather than just introducing her by name.

It doesn't feel as though coming out to someone/about something (specifically, as bi and/or poly) changes me: it might change my relationship with someone, or it might change that person (especially if they aren't aware as knowing anyone else who fits in those categories), but what I'm coming out about was true before I started the conversation, and wouldn't be less true if I didn't tell that person.

(no subject)

Date: 2015-11-12 10:26 pm (UTC)
worlds_of_smoke: A picture of a brilliantly colored waterfall cascading into a river (Default)
From: [personal profile] worlds_of_smoke
Congrats. :)

(no subject)

Date: 2015-11-13 02:52 am (UTC)
silveradept: A representation of the green 1up mushroom iconic to the Super Mario Brothers video game series. (One-up Mushroom!)
From: [personal profile] silveradept
Yay for a happy, healthy relationship for all of you, long may it continue in this vein.

One of those things that usually happens when people don't understand everything that goes on is that they reduce everything to bedroom arrangements.

Instead of asking about that, I'm more curious about how the relationship is structured - a lot of poly stuff we read is in a "primary-secondary" dynamic, but I'm pretty sure that's not the only way to do things, and that it's used as a way of getting to get poly to be more relatable to people who are otherwise in dyads.

If you can explain this in a privacy-protecting way, I'm curious to know.

(no subject)

Date: 2015-11-13 05:58 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
One thing which Liv didn't mention because she is super discreet; there's the quad where we live like a reasonably serious but quite new relationship, but I also have another relationship which is more like the almost conventional secondary relationship.

We see each other maybe once a month for dates and a couple of times in between for family events, my children are comfortable with him, but he doesn't get involved in any family decisions, nor ask me to help him make decisions.

It's funny, because in my social group now, I see more of the heirarchical or anarchical models of polyamory; when I was a child, I knew several children whose parents were part of quads or other clusters, and it just seemed nice to pool resources. They always had an adult around, and always someone who understand where they were coming from. So I guess I idealised that family structure somewhat? The pool your resources, it takes a village, style of poly maybe?

But to me, I want to describe it as 'quite simple really' but I guess that people who aren't me get confused.

(no subject)

Date: 2015-11-13 06:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ghoti.livejournal.com
Er, that was me, I'm not deliberately being anonymous I just am rubbish at logging in with openid.


But friends-of-Liv who'd like to get to know me better perhaps may wish to know that I will be doing December Days and that might be a good place to ask questions?

Ghoti

(no subject)

Date: 2015-11-14 03:01 pm (UTC)
silveradept: A kodama with a trombone. The trombone is playing music, even though it is held in a rest position (Default)
From: [personal profile] silveradept
It certainly seems simple when described, but like ducks on a pond, there's a tremendous amount of work going on underneath.

(no subject)

Date: 2015-11-16 01:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ghoti.livejournal.com
Well, yes and no. We do talk a lot about emotions, which is not my favourite thing, and logistics, which I like only slightly less. But each individual bond strengthens the whole, so to a great extent it's easier with more of us because there's more going into the relationship.

I know easy is not the same as simple, but to a great extent it just works and doesn't take more active upkeep than any other type of family.

(no subject)

Date: 2015-11-19 11:32 pm (UTC)
ayebydan: by <user name="pureimagination"> (boots)
From: [personal profile] ayebydan
Thank you for this offer. I'm going to add you to take you up on it. Just thought I would drop a line here first :)

(no subject)

Date: 2015-11-20 12:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ghoti.livejournal.com
Thanks :) Just a note which I forgot because I almost never read DW - I'm ghoti on Livejournal but don't have a DW account, ghoti on DW is someone else. AFAICT she's fascinating and charming and lovely, and well worth reading, but she's not me.

(no subject)

Date: 2015-11-16 03:44 pm (UTC)
shreena: (Default)
From: [personal profile] shreena
But to me, I want to describe it as 'quite simple really' but I guess that people who aren't me get confused.

I think it's because so many social norms and so much etiquette is tied up in this too. So, for instance, I have never quite figured out whether, if I'm inviting my friend A to dinner, whether I need to invite all of her partners, or the partner I know best, or the partner she lives with... or none of her partners. It's not that I dislike any of the partners but I have limited space around my dining table..

(no subject)

Date: 2015-11-18 08:19 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
That can be awkward, we have the same problem. I tend to either ask or go with whichever of partner-they-live-with or partner-I-know-best is most appropriate. I don't remember the last time I was invited to a small dinner by anyone other than partners. Bigger parties, we all tend to be invited anyway.

I think that's more because I tend not to want to socialise without the children, certainly for parties, but it's actually easier to socialise now because we can be divided into pairs in any direction, so leaving a parent at home with the children if that's necessary/desirable.

(no subject)

Date: 2015-11-13 06:20 am (UTC)
monanotlisa: symbol, image, ttrpg, party, pun about rolling dice and getting rolling (Default)
From: [personal profile] monanotlisa
What a lovely, thought-provoking post. Thanks for sharing, as ever.

(no subject)

Date: 2015-11-17 06:07 pm (UTC)
damerell: (trouble)
From: [personal profile] damerell
All else aside presumably sometimes the parents say "No shit, Sherlock" or whatever the tactful talking-to-offspring equivalent is. A friend of mine (who I sha'n't name) came out as gay a few years ago and, frankly, it had not occurred to me that they might not be gay.

(no subject)

Date: 2015-11-19 04:53 pm (UTC)
damerell: NetHack. (dating)
From: [personal profile] damerell
I say, I wasn't poking fun at you doing it via DW - obviously I'm not the only reader. :-)

(no subject)

Date: 2015-11-18 01:11 am (UTC)
toft: graphic design for the moon europa (Default)
From: [personal profile] toft
Congratulations on feeling in a good & stable place and coming out and doing that work! That's a big deal, and I'm happy for you.

(no subject)

Date: 2015-11-20 04:05 am (UTC)
switterbeet: A happy baby sloth hugging someone's outstretched hand (happy sloth)
From: [personal profile] switterbeet
Congrats on coming out! :D And on being happy and in love. <3

"Honestly, even with specific people I haven't found Coming Out to be a one-time, binary thing. People forget, or they don't really take in the implications of what you told them, and you find yourself having to remind them that you're Queer. And I can understand how that comes across as always going on about your identity, but there's such a huge gravitational pull towards re-closeting yourself if you don't do that."

TRUE DAT. This is a rather constant complaint of mine. :P

Soundbite

Miscellaneous. Eclectic. Random. Perhaps markedly literate, or at least suffering from the compulsion to read any text that presents itself, including cereal boxes.

Page Summary

Top topics

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
45678 910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags

Subscription Filters