This piece of casby's is rather gorgeous. Just so you don't follow the link unwarned, it's Shakespeare pastiche, and involves (implied) Dubya / Cherie Blair slash...
Mooooooodamused
TuuuuuuneSimon & Garfunkel: Bridge over troubled water
I assumed it was Tony in a particularly camp mood. You may well be right. I fear that does make the whole thing more disturbing, but then I have a bit of an issue with using female attributions in a m / m situation.
Technically, I don't think it can be called slash if it's het... Greapoihgaepbngauierbhf. What is the word then for inventing sexual relations between people of opposite sexes? I'm sure there's such a thing as hetslash.
Well, if one's talking about it as a genre, one would generally just say 'het.' But I agree that doesn't work too well in this situation, and admittedly I often say "slash" when I'm talking about het, and then get accordingly scolded by girlwithjournal. So, umm, I have no idea. On the other hand, if ixwin is right, then slash is actually a perfectly acceptable term. ;)
I'm somewhat of the opinion that people who insist on the narrow definition of "slash" should be able to immediately produce a word for the wider genre if they want anyone to pay attention.
people who insist on the narrow definition of "slash" should be able to immediately produce a word for the wider genre Oh, absolutely! I don't care what the correct term is, and indeed I'm quite happy to use whatever anyone knowledgeable may propose, but insisting that a word has a specific sense only when there's no word for the general sense is just annoying.
Miscellaneous. Eclectic. Random. Perhaps markedly literate, or at least suffering from the compulsion to read any text that presents itself, including cereal boxes.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-05-06 11:58 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-05-06 04:07 pm (UTC)You may well be right. I fear that does make the whole thing more disturbing, but then I have a bit of an issue with using female attributions in a m / m situation.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-05-06 02:16 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-05-06 04:13 pm (UTC)Greapoihgaepbngauierbhf. What is the word then for inventing sexual relations between people of opposite sexes? I'm sure there's such a thing as hetslash.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-05-06 04:19 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-05-06 05:00 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-05-06 05:04 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-05-12 11:15 am (UTC)Oh, absolutely! I don't care what the correct term is, and indeed I'm quite happy to use whatever anyone knowledgeable may propose, but insisting that a word has a specific sense only when there's no word for the general sense is just annoying.